Video Highlights![]() High Intensity Most files are RealPlayer. See real.com to download RealPlayer for PC or Mac or apple.com for QuickTime. |
THRILLER CHAMPIONSHIPS: Researchers bet on fruit fly fights to expose underlying biology of aggressionRound by round, move by move, video replay of 75 fruit fly fights reveals statistically significant patterns of normal fighting behaviorMale fruit flies that pick a fight are likely to win the battle. Losing fruit flies don't give up easily, even if it takes them longer to re-engage their foes after a particular bruising encounter. Most fruit fly fights are resolved before they escalate to intense physical contact. These are some of the results from a study of 75 fruit fly fights staged at a neurobiology laboratory at Harvard Medical School (HMS) in Boston, Mass. USA. The researchers videotaped and analyzed the fights to learn more about aggression. Future studies in the lab will use genetic mutations to investigate the neurobiology of aggression and also explore the gene expression consequences of winners and losers. The first report in the April 16 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences establishes the pattern of normal fruit fly fights. In the half-hour fights, the fruit flies averaged 27 encounters of about 11 seconds each. Each scuffle moved so fast that the researcher-referees needed slow-motion instant replay to score the fights. Harvard University undergraduates Selby Chen and Ann Yeelin Lee scored about 9,000 individual moves in 2,000 skirmishes. In case of doubt or disagreement, HMS neurobiology professor Edward Kravitz determined the final score.
Although fruit flies that pick fights are more likely to win them, especially if they are real bullies, the researchers found no obvious differences in fighting behavior separating the winners and the losers. The decision to retreat can come at any time, after any maneuver, at any level of fighting intensity.
The researchers tallied the sequence of moves by both winners and losers into a fancy statistical chart called a "Markov chain analysis" (above). Bigger boxes show more popular tactics. Smaller boxes show less common maneuvers. Likewise, thicker arrows show the most likely next move, such as the distinct fighting loop that dominates the aggressive behavior: slow approach to a wing threat to a fast approach. There are no boxes or arrows for moves and sequences that occurred less often than chance. Last updated May 3, 2002 |
Scoring SystemHigh Intensity![]() Tussling: Both flies tumble over each other, sometimes leaving food surface
Mid Intensity![]() Lunging One rears up on the hind legs and snaps down on other Chasing: One runs after the other High-level fencing: One or both flies face the other, extend leg forward and push opponent Low intensity![]() Wing threat: One flicks wings at a 45-degree angle toward opponent
Approach: One advances in the direction of the other RetreatWalk away: One turns and retreats slowly from advanceDefensive wing threat: One flicks wings at 45-degree angle facing away from oppponent Run away/being chased: One retreats quickly from advance of other Fly away: Loser flies off food surface More links: Video guide to scoring fly fights (with music) Video guide to scoring lobster fights (with music) |
Harvard Medicine | News | About HMS | Feedback | HomeCopyright 2003 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College